I’m leanin toward the GSX more because of the all wheel drive as well as the turbo, however the prelude i a nice 200horses stock and they have Almost the same amount of torque as the s2000. Well just let me know your opinion of the TWO cars, please do not say something about a car not listed up here…thanks
PRELUDE.
Newer, more fun to drive.
turbo doesn’t always mean more fun to drive, it just means more money for gas.
Not to mention that the prelude is more stylish, and has more aftermarket parts, and is cheaper t fix than mitsubishi
the honda is going to be a more reliable choice but is not going to have the performance capabilities of the eclipse…
not sure what your goals are for the cars but keep in mind that the eclipse is going to most likely break a few more parts than the prelude especially if driven hard… not to say that prelude is bullet proof either…
I think weight wise the GSX is making more out of its bulk the late model preludes are quite heavy for the amount of power they produce..
if its a daily and only light mods will be done go with the honda but if you know what your doing and are looking to go really fast the GSX may be a better choice..
A turbo doesn’t matter if you have enough HP without it, in fact turbos can make cars harder to drive because the power curve’s so distorted. I’d go with the Prelude as well, partly because I like the look but mostly because that 1997 was made right during the time when Mitsubishi was having a lot of issues with quality control. The Prelude’s likely to last longer with less money in repairs.
hahahaha, u should flag the other guy!, anywyas, i think you should go for hte Honda since its cooler and everyone i know has the eclipse, no joke. But if you get the eclipse, look for one that is pre – souped up, so you’ll have it even faster, cause everyone does that to their eclipses -atleast teh older ones – the newer ones suck. but ya def go for the prelude, good luck!
Not an answer, but i would take the prelude. I love those things, dont see them often anymore.