I was wondering witch car is better in top speed, 0-60, more reliable and also more fuel efficent. You could assume that the MR2 is a 1991 Turbo. Thank you 
Honda Nsx Vs Toyota Mr2?
Your Comments
4 Comments so far
- 1987 Honda Civic + B18c1 Gsr = ???
- Drag Race Bike Vs Car Who Wins?
- Honda Crx V Tec B16a 211bhp…….?
- Honda S2000 Vs. Mazda Rx7?
- Honda Prelude H22a??
- Car Help? Tuning Up This Honda?
- How Much Boost Can I Run On A B16a2?
- Im Looking For A Project Car Im Debating Between A?
- Which Honda Should I Get?
- Honda Civics?
© 2010 Vitara Pistons. Hosted by GigaPros.
Web Design by Imburne Technical Advisors
dude, who cares about all that stuff. if you have any brains at all you will choose the NSX over the MR2. if it is the honda nsx your talking about. the honda wins in almost every department, mainly look, and if your guying wither of these cars, i don’t think your main priority should the fuel consumption. also when it comes to cars this old then you cant expect reliabiltiy, thats just unreasonable.
p.s the nsx is faster, in almost all departments.
Are you talking about the Acura NSX? Well, the nsx surely will win if both stock, because one is 8 cyl and the MR2 is 4 cyl. But the 94-99 MR2 turbo have a better engine than the 91 with 245 hp. MR2 stock is 19 mpg on city and 25 highway. I have a 91 MR2 na.
the nsx would be more reliable, handle better, faster, quicker. look, one is a true sports car, the other a mildly fast economy car.
the nsx had a v-6
nsx would win a race, but mr2 probably would be more fuel efficient.