Comments on: Honda Nsx Vs Toyota Mr2?

By: unplugge

unplugge — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:49:58 +0000

nsx would win a race, but mr2 probably would be more fuel efficient.

By: hello

hello — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:07:08 +0000

the nsx would be more reliable, handle better, faster, quicker. look, one is a true sports car, the other a mildly fast economy car.
the nsx had a v-6

By: 86cvcSI

86cvcSI — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:52:45 +0000

Are you talking about the Acura NSX? Well, the nsx surely will win if both stock, because one is 8 cyl and the MR2 is 4 cyl. But the 94-99 MR2 turbo have a better engine than the 91 with 245 hp. MR2 stock is 19 mpg on city and 25 highway. I have a 91 MR2 na.

By: rom12345

rom12345 — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:38:30 +0000

dude, who cares about all that stuff. if you have any brains at all you will choose the NSX over the MR2. if it is the honda nsx your talking about. the honda wins in almost every department, mainly look, and if your guying wither of these cars, i don’t think your main priority should the fuel consumption. also when it comes to cars this old then you cant expect reliabiltiy, thats just unreasonable.
p.s the nsx is faster, in almost all departments.